Codaa is the reasoning layer Orbitlo runs on. Research a topic, think through a decision, plan a project, explain something buried in your own data, or work out why something broke. Building applications is one of the things it can do with that reasoning — not the whole of what it does.
Open Codaa and talk to it. Ask a question, follow up, change direction halfway through, paste something in and ask what it means. There’s no syntax to learn, no mode to switch into, no prompt format to get right.
Ask anything — build, research, plan, code. It’s a general-purpose assistant that happens to have a full development environment behind it. The same conversation where you work out whether to build something is the one where it gets built.
Gathers, compares and synthesises into an answer with the trade-offs kept intact rather than flattened into a recommendation.
Hand it data, a spec or a decision and get reasoning you can follow — not a confident guess wearing the costume of an answer.
Decomposes a goal into an ordered plan before anything gets written, so complex work stays coherent instead of drifting.
Paste a stack trace or describe the symptom. It traces cause rather than patching surface.
Write, summarise, restructure, critique. Long-form work that holds its thread from the first paragraph to the last.
When the right answer is a working tool rather than a paragraph, it plans the architecture, writes the code, and runs it beside the editor.
Codaa splits thinking from typing. A reasoning model handles planning and diagnosis — understanding what you’re actually asking, deciding on an approach, working out why something failed. A separate fast model does execution: writing files, applying fixes, answering from retrieved context.
Most tools run one model for everything, which means the model doing the hard thinking also burns its attention on boilerplate. Splitting them keeps the reasoning sharp where it matters, and it’s why the planning holds up on long sessions instead of degrading as the context fills.
Given a four-suspect logic puzzle with the constraint “exactly one statement is false,” Codaa worked each case, re-examined the most promising one line by line, and found it still produced two false statements.
Every AI product claims reasoning. Far fewer will decline to manufacture a clean answer when the clean answer isn’t there. That’s the property you actually want in a tool sitting next to your bank accounts.
When you do ask for something built, Codaa classifies the intent first — a quick change and a new application are different problems and shouldn’t run the same path. Then it plans. A non-trivial build produces a real multi-step plan before any code is written.
Codaa keeps context across a project rather than starting cold every message.
Codaa runs in working sessions rather than metering you question by question. Start working and you have a 4-hour window — build, ask, iterate, change your mind as much as you want inside it. When the window closes there’s a 15-minute cooldown, then a fresh one starts.
No. Most of what people ask it has nothing to do with code. It answers questions, researches topics, works through problems and explains things. Building is there when you need it.
No. Describe what you want in plain language. Codaa plans it, builds it, and explains what it did.
Inside Orbitlo, in an isolated sandbox. Nothing is published anywhere unless you take it there yourself.
No. It’s the reasoning layer the rest of the product runs on — the same engine behind the trading assistant and the intelligence across your modules. One subscription covers all of it.
Anything mid-build finishes. After a 15-minute cooldown you start a new window. You see the countdown well before it happens.
Beta testers get first access — and founding-member pricing when we launch. No card required. See pricing ›
We’ll only email you about beta access and launch. Unsubscribe anytime.